World Social Marketing Conference 08 – day one review
It's the morning of day two of the conference, and having missed hearing Alan Milburn speak, I thought I'd take the time for a quick update on yesterday's key speakers. I have some ten pages of notes and all my tweets as a starting point, but given the amount of information yesterday, this is just a summary.
The first half of the morning's plenary was comprehensive in its scene setting for the UK and international health context and the role that social marketing plays. After an introductory video from UK health minister Dawn Primarolo, Angela McNab (director of public health, performance and delivery at the Department of Health England) spoke about how social marketing helps people make the changes they want to make. She talked on the need for good social marketing to be based in good research, and pointed to the launch of a one stop research shop for social marketers next summer. She was followed by Philip Kotler (marketing god... not sure if there's a more appropriate job title) who gave a presentation provocatively titled "Reducing poverty through social marketing". If I was in any doubt that marketing was going to save the world, Philip Kotler was extremely persuasive. He set out a series of principles in social marketing, namely
- framing the problem
- segmenting the market
- targeting segments where the most good can be accomplished
- determining desired behaviours
- developing strategies using all four tools in the marketing toolbox
- and finally monitoring and evaluating results
As a sideline, the four Ps themselves have been under much discussion, particularly on the sidelines of the conference, with lots of talk on whether they provide a robust and comprehensive framework. Anyhow, as much as Kotler's talk was an exposition of the great work done my many social marketers internationally to help people raise themselves out of poverty - the example of Mechai Viravaidya, Thailand's "condom king", sticks in my mind - it was also a clear call to action to us as marketers. As he said
Social marketers with compassion with ask "What do you need?" and "What will help?"
Broadening the context even further, Sameer Deshpande talked about the history and context of social marketing in Asia, particularly in south Asia, reminding us that marketing is not education, nor is social marketing social networking. Sudha Tewari ended the first half of the morning's plenary with a reminder of the real life impact of social marketing in the Indian context. With 5.5 million unwanted children born every year and 6.7 million unsafe abortions, condom marketing has never been more important, and her organisation is leading the way.
The second half of the plenary (after a very well deserved coffee) saw Nancy Lee take the stage with four real life examples of the four Ps in practice, looking at tobacco cessation, littering, HIV testing and... using flags to cross the road. I can't begin to imagine that British people would even begin to think about carrying a flag across the road, but the benefits in road safety were clear. What was most striking from Nancy's presentation was the enormous cultural difference between the UK and US - and it certainly is a reminder to challenge my assumptions that I understand the context in which I'm working. Driven by real consumer understanding and deep research, Nancy's examples showed how powerful the four Ps could be in shaping meaningful social marketing programmes.
The afternoon's highlight for me was Katherine Lyon Daniel (from the US's national centre for health marketing at CDC). I heard her speak twice, once on the context of health marketing in the US and the other on her centre's work on autism. She was inspiring. In her first talk, she challenged us to take a long view, and talked about a native American saying that
In every deliberation we must consider the impact on the seventh generation.
She talked too about how consumers were overwhelmed with information, how we needed to ensure that health information, like Coca Cola, was "within an arms reach of desire" and she set out four principles for social marketing, drawn from her centre's mission statement. She said that it should be
- Accessible - ensuring we address issues of the digital divide and health literacy
- Accurate - stressing the need for us to document research and outcomes and build our body of knowledge as a profession
- Relevant - needing to understand audiences and undertake appropriate research, and finally
- Timely - again, going back to the concept of information being within "arms reach of desire"
That's it for now. About to start day two in earnest!
Labour Party Conference
But, first thing's first. Conference timetable. Tonight is the London reception at 6pm and a chance to catch up with the one or two people I know and the thousands that Paul knows. And then later it's the Only Party in the Village, LGBT Labour's party somewhere in Canal Street. Ironically, it's no longer the only party in the village (as it genuinely was last year) because having officially kicked off today, there's lots of conference happening already.
Queenz boycottz beanz
How could Heinz have made such a critical miscalculation of judgment? Their decision to withdraw an entirely innocent, rather well made and frankly quite humorous advert has filled the media over the course of today. Here it is, by the way...
Now, there could be a number of things going on here.
It is possible that Heinz were genuinely shocked by the complaints about the advert, and, believing that the small number of complainants reflected a much larger silent number of people who'd potentially not buy their products, decided it was safer to withdraw it. That would be spineless, backward and somewhat naive frankly.
Alternatively, this could be slightly more sinister. The video is available on YouTube. The advert is being talked about widely. Heinz is getting huge amounts of publicity out of the argument. The problem is... if that's the case, they've calculated that offending gay consumers and sparking a boycott is a price worth paying to get their product noticed. That, frankly, is more homophobic than the 202 complainants to the ASA.
In unrelated news, research from the US has put Heinz Ketchup at the top of the tree in terms of brand equity, measuring consumers attitudes across six areas: familiarity, quality, purchase consideration, brand expectations, distinctiveness and trust. The potential problem for Heinz is that trust, certainly among gay consumers, has just taken a serious knock. Either they are inept handlers of consumer opinion who refuse to stick to their guns. Or they are expert handlers of consumer opinion who are willing to trade one group's offence off against another's lack of concern. They might have been widely congratulated by the gay community for making a rare advert that normalised, for the general public, a display of affection between two men. Instead, gay consumers are about to turn and walk away.
What a disaster. Henry John Heinz believed that "to do a common thing uncommonly well brings success." I can't help but think that Heinz have managed to do exactly the opposite, doing an uncommon thing uncommonly badly.
Being Sralan 2
A while ago, I suggested that taking Sir Alan Sugar's decisive approach would make for better political judgments by the electorate. Being Sralan didn't help Ken, but now it seems that Sralan might be in the frame as Labour's candidate for the next London mayoral election.
He'd certainly be an interesting choice, and to be honest, his support of Labour came as a bit of a surprise to me. I suppose I labour under the misapprehension that business people will be politically conservative, though I realise that perception is somewhat behind the times. While he's hedged his bets in response to suggestions that he's being talked about, I for one think he might be good for London. Apart from anything else, I'd love to see the moment he told Boris, "You're a total shambles. You're fired."
The other thing it signals is that Ken can't take his selection as Labour's candidate for granted. Having campaigned for Ken, I was sad to see him lose, but I've been sadder to see his inability to let go and move on. Hanging around your old place of work can't be good for anyone. Surely there's a friendly job centre that can take him in hand and help him look at his job options. How can he go to a job interview if he doesn't know his job options?
Actually, it does get me thinking. What do you do once you've been at the top of the tree? It can't be easy. There's a great line in Season 2 of the West Wing, when Jed Bartlett comments to Leo McGarry that being President of the United States is the last job he'll ever have. It makes me worry for people who climb the career ladder too early, who peak too soon. If it's hard enough for Ken to walk away at an age when most people are retiring, how hard can it be to be faced with walking away 20 years before. Where do you go and what do you do?
I suppose you can always reinvent yourself as the star of TV reality show. Now here's an interesting idea - Sralan gets City Hall and Ken gets the boardroom with Nick and Margaret. Now that's a show I would watch.
Spotted
Clare Short reading the New Statesman on the Northern Line from Kennington to Clapham North and carrying a nice red jacket. Glad to see in our egalitarian age that nobody offered her a seat.
Honestly, it's like party conference on the tube sometimes...
Dwarf-sploitation
This week's Marketing Week reports that Pot Noodle will give consumer the change to duel with dwarves.
The activity, which also includes sampling, will launch at the Southend Airshow this month and will run throughout the summer... The Gladiator-style duels between consumers and dwarves on giant Pot Noodle containers will last 30 seconds. Consumers will be e-mailed film footage of their fight immediately after taking to the ring.
Recounting this story to friends yesterday prompted a random outpouring of dwarf-related entertainment stories. The oddest was from the recent Internet World, where an exhibitor had a dwarf painted blue in a cage on his stand. The blue dwarf apparently rattled the bars of his cage in the morning, and in the afternoon was running around handing out leaflets. It was something to do with document management apparently. If only document management were so exciting. Still, what with casino advertising featuring dwarves too, it seems dwarves are the new black. I can't help but feel a little uneasy that it's a very postmodern freak show, perhaps even dwarf-sploitation.
Turning blue, turning off
I've just seen the tube alcohol ban poster for the first time at Oxford Circus. To be honest, it looks a bit half-arsed. I completely understand though. If I was the creative working on it, I'd be less than enthusiastic. Especially given that a report earlier in the week claimed that 41 percent of creatives and media types had turned up to work drunk at some point in their careers. How can you do that if you can't drink during rush hour? Well, after rush hour. Being in before 10 seriously stiffles creativity. Being sober is even worse.
That said, the logo for the mayor of London seems to have changed. I always rather liked the fact that the "on" at the end of "London" was red, in contrast to the blue. In the alcohol ban poster, it's not. Given that there's red elsewhere in the poster, not using a two colour version won't be a matter of limiting printing costs, so there are two possible explanations. Either the designer, in a particularly half-arsed way, chose the single colour version because he or she couldn't be bothered. Or something's changed. It would be a very subtle way of signalling it, but changing the logo would show that Boris Johnson is true blue. Unfortunately for him, it also shows that he's not switched "on". I wonder if he ever was.
Drunk on the tube
I suppose I'll just have to leave that can of Carling unopened in my bag from 1 June onwards. Who knows, keeping it there might just stop me mugging an old lady on the way home or breaking a window or two. That at least is what Boris Johnson is hoping.
Banning people from drinking alcohol on the tube and everywhere else on public transport is a headline grabbing measure, but it's somewhat pointless. If drunk people commit crime on the tube, it's not because they're drinking, but because they're drunk. This might just sound like semantics, but it's important. In the length of an average tube journey, most people couldn't, through drinking the alcohol they decided to carry with them, get drunk enough to become violent or become inclined to commit crime. Those tiny number of people who do commit crime are a problem because when they enter the tube, they're already drunk. The only real way to stop drunk people causing trouble on the tube would be to stop drunk people getting on the tube in the first place. I'm not sure breath testing would be popular at Leicester Square at 11.30 on a Friday night, but it would leave a lot of people stranded in central London.
I'm also sceptical about Johnson having recruited, in yet another advisory appointment, former US police chief Bill Bratton. He'll help with zero tolerance policing and drive out petty crime. While the principle is sound - tolerance of low level crime can lead to greater levels of serious crime - in this case it's completely misapplied. You see, the last time I checked, drinking alcohol in public wasn't a criminal offence. And while it might be a neat trick to classify it as a crime and solve it all in the same day, it remains a trick. Making drinking on public transport a crime in order to bring in measures to deal with that crime might lull people into a false sense of security that crime is being tackled, but existing crime will not have been dealt with and in reality, nothing will have changed. Except perhaps increasing the already huge administrative burden of the police in documenting offences and taking them away from real issues of security on our public transport network.
Almost there…
Just a quick update to say that the last time anyone checked, my bit of the ward had the best turnout. More details when everything's counted tomorrow, but I'm very happy. I also seem to have volunteered myself for more campaigning. Such is life.
Fish and chips on the way right now. I'm tired but happy. I only hope I'll still be happy when the results are announced tomorrow and Ken is returned to office.
What a day!
Today has been hectic. I've walked the streets round where I live often enough to have very sore feet. All the houses are a blur, but I can say that grey is a very popular colour right now if you're painting your front door. Anyhow, whether I've put a last minute postcard through the letterbox or knocked on the door to find out someone's voting intentions, I've invested a lot of energy in a handful of streets.
Whether I like it or not, I'll feel personally responsible for the outcome when it's announced tomorrow evening. Tomorrow's waiting may be unbearable. Whatever happens though, I'm glad I've done my bit.
I've never been this involved in an election before, and I'm hooked. The by election for Gwyneth Dunwoody's seat is only a few weeks away. I might just book a train ticket...
Follow me
- So sad to hear that Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau has died. His recordings of Winterreise inspired me to take singing seriously. 2 days ago
- RT @Rethink_: 20 Commandments for MentalHealth workers: http://t.co/MKQanVQj 2 days ago
- On my way to speak at the @stonewalluk leadership programme reunion. 3 days ago
- @NickPBroom you'll notice it's not in the new job description: http://t.co/ZPzc9EUN 3 days ago
- @DickonFarmar no, Cola's an island near Fanta. In the Med. 3 days ago
About me
Categories
Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Feb | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||