Andy Jaeger big thinking for a small world

30Sep/081

World Social Marketing Conference 08 – day one review

It's the morning of day two of the conference, and having missed hearing Alan Milburn speak, I thought I'd take the time for a quick update on yesterday's key speakers. I have some ten pages of notes and all my tweets as a starting point, but given the amount of information yesterday, this is just a summary.

The first half of the morning's plenary was comprehensive in its scene setting for the UK and international health context and the role that social marketing plays. After an introductory video from UK health minister Dawn Primarolo, Angela McNab (director of public health, performance and delivery at the Department of Health England) spoke about how social marketing helps people make the changes they want to make. She talked on the need for good social marketing to be based in good research, and pointed to the launch of a one stop research shop for social marketers next summer. She was followed by Philip Kotler (marketing god... not sure if there's a more appropriate job title) who gave a presentation provocatively titled "Reducing poverty through social marketing". If I was in any doubt that marketing was going to save the world, Philip Kotler was extremely persuasive. He set out a series of principles in social marketing, namely

  • framing the problem
  • segmenting the market
  • targeting segments where the most good can be accomplished
  • determining desired behaviours
  • developing strategies using all four tools in the marketing toolbox
  • and finally monitoring and evaluating results

As a sideline, the four Ps themselves have been under much discussion, particularly on the sidelines of the conference, with lots of talk on whether they provide a robust and comprehensive framework. Anyhow, as much as Kotler's talk was an exposition of the great work done my many social marketers internationally to help people raise themselves out of poverty - the example of Mechai Viravaidya, Thailand's "condom king", sticks in my mind - it was also a clear call to action to us as marketers. As he said

Social marketers with compassion with ask "What do you need?" and "What will help?"

Broadening the context even further, Sameer Deshpande talked about the history and context of social marketing in Asia, particularly in south Asia, reminding us that marketing is not education, nor is social marketing social networking. Sudha Tewari ended the first half of the morning's plenary with a reminder of the real life impact of social marketing in the Indian context. With 5.5 million unwanted children born every year and 6.7 million unsafe abortions, condom marketing has never been more important, and her organisation is leading the way.

The second half of the plenary (after a very well deserved coffee) saw Nancy Lee take the stage with four real life examples of the four Ps in practice, looking at tobacco cessation, littering, HIV testing and... using flags to cross the road. I can't begin to imagine that British people would even begin to think about carrying a flag across the road, but the benefits in road safety were clear. What was most striking from Nancy's presentation was the enormous cultural difference between the UK and US - and it certainly is a reminder to challenge my assumptions that I understand the context in which I'm working. Driven by real consumer understanding and deep research, Nancy's examples showed how powerful the four Ps could be in shaping meaningful social marketing programmes.

The afternoon's highlight for me was Katherine Lyon Daniel (from the US's national centre for health marketing at CDC). I heard her speak twice, once on the context of health marketing in the US and the other on her centre's work on autism. She was inspiring. In her first talk, she challenged us to take a long view, and talked about a native American saying that

In every deliberation we must consider the impact on the seventh generation.

She talked too about how consumers were overwhelmed with information, how we needed to ensure that health information, like Coca Cola, was "within an arms reach of desire" and she set out four principles for social marketing, drawn from her centre's mission statement. She said that it should be

  • Accessible - ensuring we address issues of the digital divide and health literacy
  • Accurate - stressing the need for us to document research and outcomes and build our body of knowledge as a profession
  • Relevant - needing to understand audiences and undertake appropriate research, and finally
  • Timely - again, going back to the concept of information being within "arms reach of desire"

That's it for now. About to start day two in earnest!

27May/080

Disclaimers

I spent some time this afternoon rewriting the disclaimer information at the bottom of page three of the magazine I edit. It's that bit of the magazine that nobody really reads, but I decided to give it my all. Then had a slurp of coffee. Giggled to myself. And finally finished. It's not a masterpiece.

Several thoughts on disclaimers. Firstly, writing words to the effect that the views expressed in the magazine do not necessarily represent the views of the organisation does not change the reality that, for most of our readership, the views in the magazine are exactly the views of the organisation. Some people will inevitably take every word on page 12 seriously, even quotation from the mouth of an entirely independent commentator, and entirely ignore my little disclaimer. Much as I might like to absolve myself of some corporate responsibility in my editorial decisions, my readers won't give me the same latitude.

Secondly, it's hard to be funny. On the basis that few people would be committed enough to read them, I rewrote them with a humorous tone to reward them for their effort. Now I'm away from my computer and on the train home, I'm not sure I pulled it off. In any case, the world is overflowing with smug sounding marketers who want to make their widgets sound like Innocent smoothies, and I'm not sure I want to be one of them.

Finally, it's very easy to give too much attention to things that don't matter. The disclaimers, exactly as they were, were absolutely fine. I'll probably change them back tomorrow. So there's a little portion of my life I can never get back, wasted on something of no consequence. If nobody's going to notice, it can just be OK. And I could have left the office 20 minutes earlier.

DISCLAIMER: Please note that the views in this blog post do not necessarily reflect the views of Andy Jaeger.

Tagged as: , No Comments
23May/080

“Working” from home

I "worked" from home today. I say "worked" not worked because in reality my output has been somewhat limited. I think this comes with the territory though. I've never honestly known anyone come in from a day working at home with a completed version of War and Peace on their memory stick.

It does however present a bit of a problem. The organisation I work for is adopting New Ways of Working. In summary, I won't have a desk any more and I'll be expected to work, not "work", from home more often. The desk bit is fine with me. I only occupy it for 50% of my working hours anyway so sharing it with one or more people is entirely sensible. But I'm rubbish at working, rather than "working", at home. Being a social person, and doing an essentially social job, means that I've normally gone slightly loopy by the end of my day if I'm by myself. It's not good. I do not play well without others.

I'm off out for a beer, or perhaps several beers, with a friend now. I'll hug him very enthusiastically and I'm sure he'll think it's a reflection on him. In truth, I'm starved of human contact. I must never become a hermit.

6May/080

A bit of space

After a very hectic and fun week away from the office, being back at work is a shock to the system.

My email inbox was heaving this morning. I've decided, the next time I go away, to update my out of office message to say I won't be reading any of my emails when I get back to work. I might even autodelete them all. I'm kidding myself and other people otherwise. After a week, issues will either get worse or fix themselves. If they've got worse, someone will shout at me as I walk through the door. If they've fixed themselves, I don't need to know. I wonder, if I did that and made myself available to chat on the phone to anyone and everyone on my first morning back, whether my day would be more productive. I certainly wouldn't be ploughing through endless discussions about all sorts of nonsense. I could find out what I needed to know and just get on with things.

As it was, I wouldn't have been able to do that anyway. I had a new person starting in my team this morning and I've been out all afternoon going to 60 minutes worth of presentation and meeting in Birmingham. I must not let this happen again. A clear diary on my first day back from holiday is essential. It'll get filled anyway but space is invaluable.

Anyway, at the end of that busy day I find myself not at home but on a train back from Birmingham. I really just want to be in my garden. My hands are sore today from an afternoon of intensive digging, but bindweed must be dealt with, especially as I like the neighbours and don't want to annoy them. I also want to make it a garden to sit in, rather than a patch of weeds to stare at. Right now it's halfway there. It's a patch of largely weedless mud to stare at. Gravel, raised beds, the odd chair and it's done. Like an empty diary after a week's holiday, a bit of space after a busy day. Just about perfect.